« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 13   Go Down

Author Topic: Kyoto Class  (Read 22655 times)

Offline El

  • Master Hardpointer
  • Retired Administrator
  • Posts: 653
  • Cookies: 123
  • Former Vice Admin
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2007, 02:28:36 PM »
I really like this ship. Stylish design.

I'd only change one thing and that is on the nacelles put some ribbing to break up the blueness a bit, sort of like reinforced struts/shielding.
Logged

Offline tiqhud

  • BCFiles File Poster
  • Posts: 1763
  • Cookies: 1067
  • San Francisco Shipyards (HPer) file manuiplater
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2007, 03:47:10 PM »
Nice, can't wait
 :D
Logged
TiqHud
you sir, are unable to strike, the port or starboard parts of hull , of a bovine storage facility.
Canon , what people argue exists, that doesn't really  exist.
It is all the little details, that cause headaches.
"Never judge wealth with Money"
'Intelligence has Nothing to do with Politics'
it is Late, Do you know where your Towel is?

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5499
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2007, 05:21:46 PM »
Quote from: Elminster on January 30, 2007, 02:28:36 PM
I really like this ship. Stylish design.

I'd only change one thing and that is on the nacelles put some ribbing to break up the blueness a bit, sort of like reinforced struts/shielding.

thats a good idea :)
Logged
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #23 on: January 30, 2007, 09:48:22 PM »
**I'm cloning here my last post on CA Forums**

Ok... I'm doing completly the entire hull from the deepest layers even...

All this new work will be done on Ultra High Resolution whit tracered vectors...

I falled at count, that even the "black" klingon tattoes over the hull were missplaced... perhaps looks fine, but do not resist a detailled exam...

Here is the work until this point... I'm doing panel by panel over the hull  and it's looking quiet good at this point (I think)

The old "tattoo" over the main hull must be removed I think, or perhaps must be replaced whit some new one alligned whit the panels of the main hull, the ones placed over the "wings" are ok I think...

...But I'm not sure about the results... Opinions needed here please, about this matter...

Some screenies...







Logged

Offline Adonis

  • Ze Meister xP
  • Posts: 670
  • Cookies: 84
  • Da Death Squad ???
    • Star Trek Excalibur
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2007, 12:01:57 AM »
The patter on the wings is OK, but if you ask me, make less of them on the hull, it's too overcrouded now.

Oh, and hi G :D
Logged
Easy is the path to wisdom for those not blinded by themselves.

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2007, 09:13:11 PM »
Quote from: Adonis on January 31, 2007, 12:01:57 AM
The patter on the wings is OK, but if you ask me, make less of them on the hull, it's too overcrouded now.

Oh, and hi G :D

HI buddy!  :D

Mmm... Not a bad point about the main hull... Let's wait next stage...

About the wings...are not done yet! This is a raft...
Logged

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5499
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #26 on: February 02, 2007, 11:11:24 AM »
** UPDATE **

here is:












Logged
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

AndrewJ

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #27 on: February 02, 2007, 11:42:23 AM »
looks good
Logged

Offline Adm_willie

  • Posts: 70
  • Cookies: 1
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #28 on: February 02, 2007, 11:54:07 AM »
That looks great! :)
Logged

Offline cpthooker

  • Posts: 301
  • Cookies: 37
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #29 on: February 02, 2007, 12:19:55 PM »
thats great :D
Logged

'As a matter of cosmic history, it has always been easier to destroy, than to create.'
Capt Spock - The Wrath of Khan

PC Spec
Athlon X2 Skt AM2 6000+, 4GB DDR2 800 Ram
XFX Geforce 8800 ultra, Vista Ultimate 64bit

Offline Adonis

  • Ze Meister xP
  • Posts: 670
  • Cookies: 84
  • Da Death Squad ???
    • Star Trek Excalibur
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2007, 12:41:31 PM »
Now that I like my friend :)
Logged
Easy is the path to wisdom for those not blinded by themselves.

Offline Dawg81

  • Posts: 733
  • Cookies: 29
  • I am Dawg; Resistence is futile
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #31 on: February 02, 2007, 01:21:17 PM »
Looking great G but the nacelles look like glowing blocks perhpas adding some ribs to them to give it a nacelles grille would be better
Logged

Offline Nebula

  • BC elder / BCC Vice Admin
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 5499
  • Cookies: 1129
  • KM - Mod Team Member & BC - Elder (2002)
    • 9th fleet HQ
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #32 on: February 02, 2007, 01:25:52 PM »
he hasn't started on that area yet... he is working on the top of the ship atm.
Logged
Canon is what people argue exists on ships that don't exist.

Offline tiqhud

  • BCFiles File Poster
  • Posts: 1763
  • Cookies: 1067
  • San Francisco Shipyards (HPer) file manuiplater
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #33 on: February 02, 2007, 02:15:02 PM »
Good , another NOT to big ship,
Logged
TiqHud
you sir, are unable to strike, the port or starboard parts of hull , of a bovine storage facility.
Canon , what people argue exists, that doesn't really  exist.
It is all the little details, that cause headaches.
"Never judge wealth with Money"
'Intelligence has Nothing to do with Politics'
it is Late, Do you know where your Towel is?

Offline Billz

  • Posts: 1697
  • Cookies: 45
  • Doctor who? ;)
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #34 on: February 02, 2007, 05:32:12 PM »
If someone asks you if they could port this to A2, SFC3 or Legacy, tell them to go to hell.

This is Bridge Commanders baby and is sure to put BC in the history books (exadurating but hey, I like to think big  :mrgreen: )

Cannot wait for this one. Im anticipating it more then LCs intrepid, just a tiny bit more, and thats saying something!  :mrgreen:

(Hides from LC  :hide )
Logged
Can't wait for 2014 to start.

Offline Shinzon

  • Posts: 230
  • Cookies: 9
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #35 on: February 02, 2007, 09:58:11 PM »
lol... i await both with anticipation (although i've already played around with it in KM 1.0 beta)
Logged

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #36 on: February 03, 2007, 03:10:22 AM »
THX guys...  :D

More work done***






Logged

Offline Dawg81

  • Posts: 733
  • Cookies: 29
  • I am Dawg; Resistence is futile
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #37 on: February 03, 2007, 09:29:39 AM »
Looking sweet there G
Logged

Offline ModderMan

  • Freaky Old School
  • Posts: 33
  • Cookies: 2
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #38 on: February 03, 2007, 05:38:13 PM »
Better that I thought it would be G :)
Logged

Gdluque

  • Guest
Re: Kyoto Class
« Reply #39 on: February 06, 2007, 01:04:52 AM »
Quote from: ModderMan on February 03, 2007, 05:38:13 PM
Better that I thought it would be G :)

THX

Check this


Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 13   Go Up
« previous next »