Author Topic: Hobbs's WIP (Read 42628 times)

hobbs · « **Reply #820 on:** October 24, 2014, 08:41:33 PM »

this evenings update

hobbs · « **Reply #821 on:** October 24, 2014, 09:40:02 PM »

unfortunatly it causes bc to crash when im hit by weapons fire

KrrKs · « **Reply #822 on:** October 25, 2014, 09:27:08 AM »

It looks great!

hobbs · « **Reply #823 on:** October 25, 2014, 10:36:03 AM »

thank you and i managed to fix it

it works in bc brilliantly no loss of detail but i managed to reduce it from 10000+ polys to 7000+

King Class Scout · « **Reply #824 on:** October 25, 2014, 11:51:34 AM »

stop right there, you're done with this ship! ooo, I wish I had my comp, I'd beta this in a new york minute.

hobbs · « **Reply #825 on:** October 25, 2014, 02:25:44 PM »

Quote from: King Class Scout on October 25, 2014, 11:51:34 AM

stop right there, you're done with this ship! ooo, I wish I had my comp, I'd beta this in a new york minute.

agreed all done now...

... beta testers needed

hobbs · « **Reply #826 on:** October 31, 2014, 05:41:42 PM »

ok i sorted an old ship

3 of 12 · « **Reply #827 on:** November 01, 2014, 11:23:35 AM »

I hope there's a Nemesis model to go along with that

Tuskin38 · « **Reply #828 on:** November 01, 2014, 08:17:44 PM »

The.... Ark?

King Class Scout · « **Reply #829 on:** November 02, 2014, 09:42:40 AM »

we're gonna be lucky to get THIS. I don't think there's ever been a good clear shot of Nemesis to work from, anyway. personally, I'd rather add Axalon and whatever the ship was that Ravage was flying as in game useables. the Ark would make v'ger look like a space station in real scale (and the JJprise the CORRECT scale!)

hobbs · « **Reply #830 on:** November 02, 2014, 04:54:47 PM »

correct kori

and yes im thinking about doing the nemisis

hobbs · « **Reply #831 on:** November 13, 2014, 05:52:43 PM »

Hi all
ive been working on this... its the 2014 version of the Uss Griffin (my own design ive tried to make many times)

Darkthunder · « **Reply #832 on:** November 14, 2014, 09:16:06 AM »

Forward part of the stardrive may need some work, but the saucer and nacelles look pretty good. I'd probably widen the pylons a bit thou (say 50%), and move the nacelles closer to the hull.

hobbs · « **Reply #833 on:** November 14, 2014, 01:16:35 PM »

Thanks DT (i swear it was a d not an s on my phone lol)

That's what I have so far... its still got aways to go.
as for nacelle distance etc... its my ship that has the moving nacelles to facilitate lesser power use during combat so they will move in lol

moed · « **Reply #834 on:** November 14, 2014, 08:14:36 PM »

Looks very promising but I'd angle the nacelles a bit forward and down... would give it more of a streamlined look IMO.

FarShot · « **Reply #835 on:** November 14, 2014, 08:19:05 PM »

As long as you keep retackling the Griffin, I'd put serious consideration into finding some other way to do telescoping pylons other than a huge chunky piston. It doesn't really match the Star Trek i.p. and there's tons of engineering reasons why not to do it so hamfistedly.

007bashir · « **Reply #836 on:** November 15, 2014, 03:48:28 AM »

Why not something like the Phoenix Spaceship from Dr. Cochrane had? (folding Pylons)?

hobbs · « **Reply #837 on:** November 15, 2014, 04:16:00 AM »

its an idea but when i tried it i didnt like the look..... ill research

FarShot · « **Reply #838 on:** November 15, 2014, 05:53:51 PM »

I'm not suggesting that they can't literally extend linearly. There's myriads of mechanical apparatuses that humanity has discovered over the years to accomplish such movements.

hobbs · « **Reply #839 on:** November 15, 2014, 06:12:03 PM »

well ive had a bit of a redesign... i still have the piston type pylons at the moment but im working on them lol

News:

Author Topic: Hobbs's WIP (Read 42628 times)